The epistemic benefits of disagreement

Author(s)

    • Lougheed, Kirk

Bibliographic Information

The epistemic benefits of disagreement

Kirk Lougheed

(Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics, v. 51)

Springer, c2020

Available at  / 1 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

Includes bibliographical references

Description and Table of Contents

Description

This book presents an original discussion and analysis of epistemic peer disagreement. It reviews a wide range of cases from the literature, and extends the definition of epistemic peerhood with respect to the current one, to account for the actual variability found in real-world examples. The book offers a number of arguments supporting the variability in the nature and in the range of disagreements, and outlines the main benefits of disagreement among peers i.e. what the author calls the benefits to inquiry argument.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction to the Epistemology of Disagreement.- Chapter 2: An Analysis of Ideal Cases of Disagreement.- Chapter 3: An Analysis of Epistemic Peerhood.- Chapter 4: The Benefits to Inquiry Argument.- Chapter 5: Objections to the Benefits to Inquiry Argument.- Chapter 6: Disagreement and Change of View.

by "Nielsen BookData"

Related Books: 1-1 of 1

Details

  • NCID
    BC10502910
  • ISBN
    • 9783030345020
  • Country Code
    sz
  • Title Language Code
    eng
  • Text Language Code
    eng
  • Place of Publication
    Cham
  • Pages/Volumes
    xiv, 126 p.
  • Size
    25 cm
  • Classification
  • Subject Headings
  • Parent Bibliography ID
Page Top