The case for contextualism : knowledge, skepticism, and context
著者
書誌事項
The case for contextualism : knowledge, skepticism, and context
[Produced by Amazon], 2011
- v. 1 : pbk
並立書誌 全1件
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [278]-283) and index
Reprint. Originally published: New York : Oxford University Press, 2011
Printed in Japan
内容説明・目次
内容説明
It's an obvious enough observation that the standards that govern whether ordinary speakers will say that someone knows something vary with context: What we are happy to call "knowledge" in some ("low-standards") contexts we'll deny is "knowledge" in other ("high-standards") contexts. But do these varying standards for when ordinary speakers will attribute knowledge, and for when they are in some important sense warranted in attributing knowledge, reflect varying
standards for when it is or would be true for them to attribute knowledge? Or are the standards that govern whether such claims are true always the same? And what are the implications for epistemology if these truth-conditions for knowledge claims shift with context? Contextualism is the view that the
epistemic standards a subject must meet, in order for a claim attributing "knowledge" to her to be true, do vary with context. This has been hotly debated in epistemology and philosophy of language during the last few decades. In The Case for Contextualism Keith DeRose offers a sustained state-of-the-art exposition and defense of the contextualist position, presenting and advancing the most powerful arguments in favor of the view and against its "invariantist" rivals, and responding to
the most pressing objections facing contextualism.
目次
- 1. Contextualism, Invariantism, Skepticism, and What Goes On in Ordinary Conversation
- 2. The Ordinary Language Basis for Contextualism
- 3. Assertion, Knowledge, and Context
- 4. Single Scoreboard Semantics
- 5. "Bamboozled by Our Own Words": Semantic Blindness and Some Objections to Contextualism
- 6. Now You Know It, Now You Don't: Intellectualism, Contextualism, and Subject-Sensitive Invariantism
- 7. Knowledge, Assertion and Action: Contextualism vs. Subject-Sensitive Invariantism
- References
「Nielsen BookData」 より