Constitutional law and precedent : international perspectives on case-based reasoning
著者
書誌事項
Constitutional law and precedent : international perspectives on case-based reasoning
Routledge, 2022
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This collection examines case-based reasoning in constitutional adjudication; that is, how courts decide on constitutional cases by referring to their own prior case law and the case law of other national, foreign, and international courts.
Argumentation based on judicial authority is now fundamental to the resolution of constitutional disputes. At the same time, it is the most common form of reasoning used by courts. This volume shows not only the strengths and weaknesses of such argumentation, but also its serious methodological shortcomings. The book is comparative in nature, with individual chapters examining similar problems that different courts have resolved in different ways. The research covers three types of courts; namely the civil law constitutional courts of Germany, Italy, Poland, Lithuania, and Hungary; the common law supreme courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia; and the European international courts represented by the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. The authors are distinguished scholars from various countries who specialise in constitutional justice issues.
This book will be of interest to legal theorists and practitioners, and will be especially insightful for constitutional court judges.
The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.
目次
Introduction: On the Methodology of the Research on Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication
PART I: Supreme Courts in Common Law System
Chapter 1: United States of America
The Supreme Court of the United States: legitimate law-maker and constitutional interpreter
Chapter 2: Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada: The Road to Authority, Legitimacy, and Independence
Chapter 3: Australia
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of The High Court of Australia
PART II: Constitutional Courts in Civil Law System
Chapter 4: Germany
The Role of Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court
Chapter 5: Hungary
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court
Chapter 6: Italy
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Adjudications of the Italian Constitutional Court
Chapter 7: Latvia
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication: The Republic of Latvia
Chapter 8: Poland
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland
Chapter 9: Romania
The Role of Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Romanian Constitutional Court
PART III: International Courts in European Law System
Chapter 10: Court of Justice of the European Union
Court of Justice of the European Union - 'Stone-by-Stone' Case-Based Reasoning
Chapter 11: European Court of Human Rights
Precedent in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights
PART IV: Comparative Analysis
Chapter 12: Conclusion
The Role of Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication: A Comparative Study
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より