The racial contract
著者
書誌事項
The racial contract
Cornell University Press, 2022
25th anniversary ed
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全3件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
"First edition published 1997 by Cornell University Press" -- T.p. verso
"First printed in paperback 1999" -- T.p. verso
"Twenty-fifth anniversary printing with new material 2022"--T.p. verso
"With a new preface by the author and a foreword by Tommie Shelby"--Cover
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The Racial Contract puts classic Western social contract theory, deadpan, to extraordinary radical use. With a sweeping look at the European expansionism and racism of the last five hundred years, Charles W. Mills demonstrates how this peculiar and unacknowledged "contract" has shaped a system of global European domination: how it brings into existence "whites" and "non-whites," full persons and sub-persons, how it influences white moral theory and moral psychology; and how this system is imposed on non-whites through ideological conditioning and violence. The Racial Contract argues that the society we live in is a continuing white supremacist state.
As this 25th anniversary edition-featuring a foreword by Tommy Shelbie and a new preface by the author-makes clear, the still-urgent The Racial Contract continues to inspire, provoke, and influence thinking about the intersection of the racist underpinnings of political philosophy.
目次
INTRODUCTION
1. OVERVIEW
The Racial Contract is political, moral, and epistemological
The Racial Contract is a historical actuality
The Racial Contract is an exploitation contract
2. DETAILS
The Racial Contract norms (and races) space
The Racial Contract norms (and races) the individual
The Racial Contract underwrites the modernsocial contract
The Racial Contract has to be enforced throughviolence and ideological conditioning
3. "NATURALIZED" MERITS
The Racial Contract historically tracks the actual moral/political consciousness of (most) white moral agents
The Racial Contract has always been recognized by nonwhites as the real moral/political agreement to be challenged
The "Racial Contract" as a theory is explanatorily superior to the raceless social contract
「Nielsen BookData」 より