Online courts and the future of justice
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Online courts and the future of justice
Oxford University Press, 2019
1st ed
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Our court system is struggling. It is too costly to deliver justice for all but the few, too slow to satisfy those who can access it. Yet the values implicit in disputes being resolved in person, and in public, are fundamental to how we have imagined the fair resolution of disputes for centuries. Could justice be delivered online? The idea has excited and appalled in equal measure, promising to bring justice to all, threatening to strike at the heart of what we mean
by justice.
With online courts now moving from idea to reality, we are looking at the most fundamental change to our justice system for centuries, but the public understanding of and debate about the revolution is only just beginning.
In Online Courts and the Future of Justice Richard Susskind, a pioneer of rethinking law for the digital age, confronts the challenges facing our legal system and the potential for technology to bring much needed change. Drawing on years of experience leading the discussion on conceiving and delivering online justice, Susskind here charts and develops the public debate.
Against a background of austerity politics and cuts to legal aid, the public case for online courts has too often been framed as a business case by both sides of the debate. Are online courts preserving the public bottom line by finding efficiencies? Or sacrificing the interests of the many to deliver cut price justice? Susskind broadens the debate by making the moral case (whether online courts are required by principles of justice) and the jurisprudential case (whether online courts are
compatible with our understanding of judicial process and constitutional rights) for delivering justice online.
Table of Contents
PART ONE - CONTEXT
1: The case for change
2: Advances in technology
3: Thinking strategically
4: Legal theory of courts
5: Physical, virtual, online hearings
6: Access to justice revisited
PART TWO - ARCHITECTURE
7: The vision
8: Online guidance
9: Assisted argument
10: Containment
11: Online resolution by judges
12: Civil, criminal, family disputes
13: Case studies
PART THREE - THE CASE AGAINST
14: Economy-class justice
15: Adversarial v investigatory
16: Open justice and fair trial
17: Face-to-face justice
18: Digital exclusion
19: Loss of majesty
20: Public sector technology
PART FOUR - THE FUTURE
21: Machine learning and prediction
22: Technology-mediated negotiation
23: Artificial intelligence
24: Telepresence, augmented reality and virtual reality
25: The role for human beings
Further Reading
by "Nielsen BookData"