Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory
(Oxford surveys in syntax and morphology, 11)(Oxford linguistics)
Oxford University Press, c2022
- : pbk
Related Bibliography 1 items
Available at 5 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
-
Kobe Shoin Women's University Library / Kobe Shoin Women's College Library
: pbk801.5/58412608234
Note
Includes bibliographical references and indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book examines a challenging problem at the intersection of theoretical linguistics and the psychology of language: the interpretation of gradient judgments of sentence acceptability in relation to theories of grammatical knowledge. Acceptability judgments constitute the primary source of data on which such theories have been built, despite being susceptible to various extra-grammatical factors. Through a review of experimental and corpus-based research on a
variety of syntactic phenomena and an in-depth examination of two case studies, Elaine J. Francis argues for two main positions. The first is that converging evidence from online comprehension tasks, elicited production tasks, and corpora of naturally-occurring discourse can help to determine the sources
of variation in acceptability judgments and to narrow down the range of plausible theoretical interpretations. The second is that the interpretation of judgment data depends crucially on the theoretical commitments and assumptions made, especially with respect to the nature of the syntax-semantics interface and the choice of either a categorical or a gradient notion of grammaticality. The theoretical frameworks considered in this book include derivational theories (e.g. Minimalism, Principles
and Parameters), constraint-based theories (e.g. Sign-based Construction Grammar, Simpler Syntax), competition-based theories (e.g. Stochastic Optimality Theory, Decathlon Model), and usage-based approaches. The volume shows that while acceptability judgment data are typically compatible with the
assumptions of various theoretical frameworks, some gradient phenomena are best captured within frameworks that permit soft constraints-non-categorical grammatical constraints that encode the conventional preferences of language users.
Table of Contents
General preface
Acknowledgments
List of figures
List of abbreviations
1: The problem of gradient acceptability
2: Theories of grammatical knowledge in relation to formal syntactic and non-syntactic explanations
3: On distinguishing formal syntactic constraints from other aspects of linguistic knowledge
4: On distinguishing formal syntactic constraints from processing constraints
5: On the relationship between corpus frequency and acceptability
6: Relative clause extraposition and PP extraposition in English and German
7: Resumptive pronouns in Hebrew, English, and Cantonese relative clauses
8: Gradient acceptability, methodological diversity, and theoretical interpretation
Glossary
References
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"