Conservative thought and American constitutionalism since the New Deal
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Conservative thought and American constitutionalism since the New Deal
Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022
- : hardcover
Available at 4 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
An intellectual history of American conservativism since the New Deal.
The New Deal fundamentally changed the institutions of American constitutional government and, in turn, the relationship of Americans to their government. Johnathan O'Neill's Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal examines how various types of conservative thinkers responded to this significant turning point in the second half of the twentieth century.
O'Neill identifies four fundamental transformations engendered by the New Deal: the rise of the administrative state, the erosion of federalism, the ascendance of the modern presidency, and the development of modern judicial review. He then considers how various schools of conservative thought (traditionalists, neoconservatives, libertarians, Straussians) responded to these major changes in American politics and culture. Conservatives frequently argued among themselves, and their responses to the New Deal ranged from adaptation to condemnation to political mobilization.
Ultimately, the New Deal pulled American governance and society permanently leftward. Although some of the New Deal's liberal gains have been eroded, a true conservative counterrevolution was never, O'Neill argues, a realistic possibility. He concludes with a plea for conservative thinkers to seriously reconsider the role of Congress—a body that is relatively ignored by conservative intellectuals in favor of the courts and the presidency—in America's constitutional order. Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal explores the scope and significance of conservative constitutional analysis amid the broader field of American political thought.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Varieties of American Conservatism after the New Deal
Part I. The Administrative State: An Overview
Chapter 1. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, Libertarians, and the Administrative State
Chapter 2. Straussians, the Administrative State, and the Rise of the Unitary Executive, Part 1
Part II. The Erosion of Federalism: An Overview
Chapter 3. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, and the Erosion of Federalism
Chapter 4. Libertarians and the Erosion of Federalism
Chapter 5. Straussians and the Erosion of Federalism
Part III. The Modern Presidency: An Overview
Chapter 6. Traditionalists, the Modern Presidency, and the Rise of the Unitary Executive, Part 2
Chapter 7. Straussians, Neoconservatives, Libertarians, and the Modern Presidency
Part IV. Modern Judicial Review: An Overview
Chapter 8. Traditionalists, Neoconservatives, and Modern Judicial Review
Chapter 9. Straussians and Modern Judicial Review
Chapter 10. Libertarians and Modern Judicial Review: Toward the Imperative of Litigation
Conclusion: Conservatives, Congress, and the Future of American Constitutionalism
Notes
Index
by "Nielsen BookData"