Modern modalities : studies of the history of modal theories from medieval nominalism to logical positivism
著者
書誌事項
Modern modalities : studies of the history of modal theories from medieval nominalism to logical positivism
[Amazon], [2013]
- : softcover
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Reprint. Originally published: Kluwer Academic Publishers : Dordrecht, 1988
"Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1988" -- t.p. verso
Amazonサイト上の発行日: 2013.10
Original issued in series: Synthese historical library ; v. 33
"Printed in Japan 落丁、乱丁本のお問い合わせは Amazon.co.jp カスタマーサービスへ" -- last page
Includes bibliographies and indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The word "modem" in the title of this book refers primarily to post-medieval discussions, but it also hints at those medieval mo dal theories which were considered modem in contradistinction to ancient conceptions and which in different ways influenced philosophical discussions during the early modem period. The me dieval developments are investigated in the opening paper, 'The Foundations of Modality and Conceivability in Descartes and His Predecessors', by Lilli Alanen and Simo Knuuttila. Boethius's works from the early sixth century belonged to the sources from which early medieval thinkers obtained their knowledge of ancient thought. They offered extensive discus sions of traditional modal conceptions the basic forms of which were: (1) the paradigm of possibility as a potency striving to realize itself; (2) the "statistical" interpretation of modal no tions where necessity means actuality in all relevant cases or omnitemporal actuality, possibility means actuality in some rel evant cases or sometimes, and impossibility means omnitemporal non-actuality; and (3) the "logical" definition of possibility as something which, being assumed, results in nothing contradic tory. Boethius accepted the Aristotelian view according to which total possibilities in the first sense must prove their met tle through actualization and possibilities in the third sense are assumed to be realized in our actual history. On these presump tions, all of the above-mentioned ancient paradigms imply the Principle of Plenitude according to which no genuine possibility remains unrealized.
目次
The Foundations of Modality and Conceivability in Descartes and his Predecessors.- Hobbes's System of Modalities.- Was Leibniz's Deity an Akrates?.- Hegel on Modalities and Monadology.- Plenitude and Contingency: Modal Concepts in Nineteenth Century French Philosophy.- Frege and his German Contemporaries on Alethic Modalities.- From Possibility to Probability: British Discussions on Modality in the Nineteenth Century.- The Failure of Logical Positivism to Cope with Problems of Modal Theory.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.
「Nielsen BookData」 より