Legal privilege and transnational evidence-taking : a comparative study on cross-border disclosure, evidence-shopping and legal privilege
著者
書誌事項
Legal privilege and transnational evidence-taking : a comparative study on cross-border disclosure, evidence-shopping and legal privilege
Intersentia, c2022
大学図書館所蔵 全2件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
"This research was finalised on 15th November 2021 as the result of a PhD project, and has since then been updated ..."--Pref
Includes bibliographical references (p. 265-288) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
There are various methods for taking evidence abroad during litigation. This book examines two of these: obtaining legal documents from a foreign national adversarial party during the main proceedings ('cross-border disclosure'); and obtaining documents with the help of an auxiliary court, with the aim of introducing them as evidence during foreign civil proceedings ('evidence shopping'). It has a particular focus on the situation where a party wants to inspect information that their opponent has confidentially shared with a foreign (in-house) lawyer.In such instances, various questions arise. May the court grant the disclosure order based solely on the procedural law of its state? If so, how should the court determine the applicable law regarding possible legal privilege? Will this be in accordance with the rules of its own state, or should the court apply a foreign state's rules instead? Does it make a difference whether the applicant requests disclosure during the main proceedings, or in the context of civil proceedings that will take place abroad?This book analyses these questions in relation to the U.S. federal, English, French, German and Dutch legal systems. It concludes by proposing a new rule that courts should use for determining the applicable legal privilege law in such cases.
「Nielsen BookData」 より