Retirement guardrails : how proactive fiduciaries can improve plan outcomes
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Retirement guardrails : how proactive fiduciaries can improve plan outcomes
Cambridge University Press, 2023
- : hardback
Available at 1 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Scores of lawsuits have pushed retirement plan sponsors to shorter, easier-to-navigate menus, but - as Ian Ayres and Quinn Curtis argue in this work - we've only scratched the surface of retirement plan design. Using participant-level plan data and straightforward tests, Ayres and Curtis show how plan sponsors can monitor plans for likely allocation mistakes and adapt menus to encourage success. Beginning with an overview of the problem of high costs and the first empirical evidence on retirement plan fee lawsuits, they offer an overview of the current plan landscape. They then show, based on reforms to a real plan, how streamlining menus, eliminating pitfalls, and adopting static and dynamic limits on participant allocations to certain risky assets or 'guardrails' can reduce mistakes and lead to better retirement outcomes. Focusing on plausible, easy-to-implement interventions, Retirement Guardrails shows that fiduciaries need not be limited to screening out funds but can design menus to actively promote good choices.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- 1. The case for proactive fiduciaries
- 2. Fees and dominated funds
- 3. Of lawsuits and letters
- 4. What more fiduciaries should learn: Assessing the prevalence of allocation errors
- 5. What more fiduciaries should learn: Assessing whether participants portfolios perform poorly
- 6. What fiduciaries can do to remedy menu misuse: Different ways to implement streamlining and guardrailing
- 7. How should fiduciaries trade-off divergent participant interests?
- 8. Can streamlining and guardrailing mitigate allocation error?
- 9. The growing misuse of brokerage windows
- Conclusion
- Index.
by "Nielsen BookData"