Uses of history in constitutional adjudication

書誌事項

Uses of history in constitutional adjudication

edited by Francesco Biagi, Justin O. Frosini, Jason Mazzone

(History of European political and constitutional thought / series editor, Erica Benner ... [et al.], 10 . Comparative constitutional history ; v. 2)

Brill, 2023

  • : hardback

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 1

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliography and references

Index: p. [377]-380

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Constitutions are a product of history, but what is the role of history in interpreting and applying constitutional provisions? This volume addresses that question from a comparative perspective, examining different uses of history by courts in determining constitutional meaning. The book shows that there is considerable debate around the role of history in constitutional adjudication. Are, for example, historical public debates over the adoption of a constitution relevant to reading its provisions today? If a constitution represents a break from a prior repressive regime, should courts construe the constitution's provisions in light of that background? Are former constitutions relevant to interpreting a new constitution? Through an assessment of current practices the volume offers some lessons for the future practices of courts as they adjudicate constitutional cases. Contributors are: Mark D. Rosen, Jorge M. Farinacci-Fernos, Justin Collings, Jean-Christophe Bedard-Rubin, Cem Tecimer, Angel Aday Jimenez Aleman, Ana Beatriz Robalinho, Keigo Obayashi, Zoltan Szente, Shih-An Wang, and Diego Werneck Arguelhes.

目次

Acknowledgments List of Tables Notes on Contributors Introduction Francesco Biagi , Justin O . Frosini and Jason Mazzone Part 1 Framing the Problem 1 History Limit or License in Constitutional Adjudication? Mark D . Rosen 2 When History Requires the Use of History in Constitutional Adjudication Jorge M. Farinacci-Fern o s 3 Memory as Mantle Evil Pasts and Judges' Power in Germany and South Africa Justin Collings Part 2 Historical Precedents and Inter-constitutional Interpretation 4 Comparing Constitutional Historicities The Case of Precedents in Canada and the United States Jean-Christophe B e dard-Rubin 5 Inter-constitutional Interpretation A Case Study of the Articles of Confederation Cem Tecimer Part 3 A Matter of Narratives 6 Janus' Third Face? The Spanish Constitutional Court at the Crossroads of History A ngel Aday Jim e nez Alem a n 7 Competing Narratives The Use of Historical Arguments in Constitutional Interpretation in Brazil Ana Beatriz Robalinho 8 Manipulating Constitutional, Legislative and Judicial History Incremental Judicial Activism in the Japanese Supreme Court Keigo Obayashi Part 4 New Democracies and Illiberal Regimes 9 How Not to Use History in Constitutional Interpretation The Aborted Resurrection of the Historical Constitution in Hungary Zolt a n Szente 10 Using the Authoritarian Past for Constitutional Interpretation in New Democracies The Example of the Taiwan Constitutional Court Shih-An Wang Conclusion Which History, Whose Past? Diego Werneck Arguelhes Index

「Nielsen BookData」 より

関連文献: 1件中  1-1を表示

詳細情報

  • NII書誌ID(NCID)
    BD01654857
  • ISBN
    • 9789004437050
  • 出版国コード
    ne
  • タイトル言語コード
    eng
  • 本文言語コード
    eng
  • 出版地
    Leiden
  • ページ数/冊数
    xi, 380 p.
  • 大きさ
    25 cm
  • 分類
  • 件名
  • 親書誌ID
ページトップへ