The academic discourse of mechanical engineering : a corpus-based study into rhetorical conventions of research articles
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
The academic discourse of mechanical engineering : a corpus-based study into rhetorical conventions of research articles
（Studies in corpus linguistics, v. 107）
J. Benjamins, c2023
- : HB
Available at / 4 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [303]-314) and index
Contents of Works
- Theoretical frameworks
- Mechanical engineering : its nature, the informants and the corpus
- Methodology
- Rhetorical structures of mechanical engineering research articles
- The phraseological profile of mechanical engineering research articles
- Rhetorical variation within the mechanical engineering discipline
- Conclusions and implications
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This volume examines rhetorical conventions employed in mechanical engineering research to understand the knowledge-making principles of the discipline, as well as their expression within the research article. In particular, the study analyses the organisational patterns of mechanical engineering research articles using Swales's conceptualisation of moves and steps. In addition, the research identifies the phraseology associated with specific moves and steps. The study draws on a corpus of 120 mechanical engineering research articles, equally distributed across two sub-disciplines (mechanical systems and thermal-fluids engineering), three research traditions (experimental, theoretical and mixed methods), and two publication periods (2002-2006 and 2012-2016). It adopts an integrated methodology, intertwining various approaches and perspectives including corpus linguistics, move analysis, discourse analysis and interviews to address two main strands of research enquiry: (i) What are the properties of the rhetorical structures in terms of range, frequency, and length for each section of mechanical engineering research articles? (ii) What effect does sub-discipline, research tradition and publication date have on the rhetorical structure of research articles?
by "Nielsen BookData"
