Cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism : who is cosmopolitan now?
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism : who is cosmopolitan now?
（International political theory）
Palgrave Macmillan, c2022
- : pbk
Available at / 1 libraries
-
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographical references and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book suggests that more can be said about cosmopolitanism than either the bold endorsement of a world state or the humble recognition of the equal moral worth of individuals, which makes everybody cosmopolitan. Identifying problems with the traditional concept and disentangling a variety of positions within the cosmopolitan paradigm, it introduces the more refined concept of cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism, which denies underived special duties among fellow citizens or other related individuals, such as family members or friends.
Cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism promises to overcome an entrenched debate wherein everybody is a cosmopolitan, and brings back the radical character traditionally associated with the term. It portrays cosmopolitanism as a distinct and thorough position challenging classic proponents such as Barry, Caney, Nussbaum, and Pogge, and questioning their theories' cosmopolitan character. Cosmopolitanism as nonrelationism has consequences for world politics without prescribing any unfeasible global order: It establishes normative criteria for evaluating institutions and provides guidance for the development of new ones.
Table of Contents
1. IntroductionPart I Cosmopolitanism as Moral Egalitarianism: The Standard Definition2. Analysis of the Standard Definition of Cosmopolitanism3. The Problems of the Standard Definition of CosmopolitanismPart II Specifying the Concept of Cosmopolitanism4. Cosmopolitanism About Justice: Specifying Universality5. Cosmopolitanism About Culture: Specifying IndividualismPart III Cosmopolitanism as Nonrelationism: A Defence6. Cosmopolitanism as Nonrelationism and Relevant Duties of Justice7. Refuting the Relationist Challenge: Room for Partiality Rather Than Advocating Special Duties8. Consequences and Conclusion
by "Nielsen BookData"