Colonial institutions and civil war : indirect rule and Maoist insurgency in India
著者
書誌事項
Colonial institutions and civil war : indirect rule and Maoist insurgency in India
(Cambridge studies in contentious politics)
Cambridge University Press, 2021
- : hbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
What explains the peculiar spatial variation of Maoist insurgency in India? Mukherjee develops a novel typology of colonial indirect rule and land tenure in India, showing how they can lead to land inequality, weak state and Maoist insurgency. Using a multi-method research design that combines qualitative analysis of archival data on Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh states, Mukherjee demonstrates path dependence of land/ethnic inequality leading to Maoist insurgency. This is nested within a quantitative analysis of a district level dataset which uses an instrumental variable analysis to address potential selection bias in colonial choice of princely states. The author also analyses various Maoist documents, and interviews with key human rights activists, police officers, and bureaucrats, providing rich contextual understanding of the motivations of agents. Furthermore, he demonstrates the generalizability of his theory to cases of colonial frontier indirect rule causing ethnic secessionist insurgency in Burma, and the Taliban insurgency in Pakistan.
目次
- Part I. Theory: 1. Colonial Institutions and Civil War
- 2. Legacies of Colonial Indirect Rule: Weak State, Ethnic Inequality and Insurgency
- 3. Varieties of Indirect Rule and Causal Pathways to Maoist Insurgency in India
- Part II. Qualitative and Quantitative Testing: 4. Qualitative Analysis of Maoist Strategy and Rebel Agency
- 5. Quantitative Testing of Effects of British Indirect Rule on Maoist Insurgency
- 6. Colonial Choice or Random Contingency? Addressing Selection Bias in British Indirect Rule
- 7. Maoist Insurgency in Chhattisgarh: The Raja of Bastar and Tribal Rebellion
- 8. Maoist Insurgency in Andhra Pradesh: The Nizam's Shadow on Telangana
- Part III. Generalizability: 9. Explaining Partial Success of Maoists in Kerala and Karnataka
- 10. Frontiers of Empire: Indirect Rule and Insurgency in Burma and Pakistan
- 11. Conclusion: Policy Implications and Future of the Maoist Conflict.
「Nielsen BookData」 より