The rule of law and emergency in colonial India : judicial politics in the early nineteenth century
著者
書誌事項
The rule of law and emergency in colonial India : judicial politics in the early nineteenth century
（Cambridge imperial and post-colonial studies series / general editor, A.G. Hopkins）
Palgrave Macmillan, c2021
- : [pbk]
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全1件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 155-174) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book takes a closer look at colonial despotism in early nineteenth-century India and argues that it resulted from Indians' forum shopping, the legal practice which resulted in jurisdictional jockeying between an executive, the East India Company, and a judiciary, the King's Court. Focusing on the collisions that took place in Bombay during the 1820s, the book analyses how Indians of various descriptions-peasants, revenue defaulters, government employees, merchants, chiefs, and princes-used the court to challenge the government (and vice versa) and demonstrates the mechanism through which the lawcourt hindered the government's indirect rule, which relied on local Indian rulers in newly conquered territories. The author concludes that existing political anxiety justified the East India Company's attempt to curtail the power of the court and strengthen their own power to intervene in emergencies through the renewal of the company's charter in 1834. An insightful read for those researching Indian history and judicial politics, this book engages with an understudied period of British rule in India, where the royal courts emerged as sites of conflict between the East India Company and a variety of Indian powers.
目次
1. Law and Emergency: Two Logics of Colonial Governance2. Reform Public and the King's Court in Bombay City3. Summonses, Writs, and Revenue Defaulters in the Mofussil4. Indirect Rule Threatened by Raiders, Princes, and the King's Court5. Habeas Corpus in Times of Emergency: The Bombay Dispute6. Bengal, Madras, and Imperial Debate on Despotism7. Epilogue and Conclusion
「Nielsen BookData」 より
