Constructing research questions : doing interesting research
著者
書誌事項
Constructing research questions : doing interesting research
SAGE, c2024
2nd ed
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 全1件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [130]-144) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
A key step for researchers wanting to produce interesting and influential theory development is formulating innovative research questions.
In this text, Alvesson and Sandberg have developed a problematization methodology for identifying and challenging the assumptions underlying existing knowledge, and for generating research questions that can lead to more impactful theories.
The second edition of this popular text has been fully updated, with more illustrative examples and insights from a diverse range of recent studies which explore methods for conducting more innovative research. This book is essential reading for students and researchers looking to formulate interesting research questions and conduct more engaging and original research.
Mats Alvesson is Professor of Business Administration at the University of Bath, and also affiliated with Lund University, Stockholm School of Economics and Bayes Business School, City, University of London.
Jörgen Sandberg is Professor in the University of Queensland (UQ) Business School and Honorary Professor at Warwick Business School.
目次
1 Research questions: a core ingredient in developing interesting theories
2 The context of constructing and formulating research questions
3 Gap-spotting: the prevalent way of constructing research questions in social science
4 A critical evaluation of gap-spotting research: does it lead to interesting theories?
5 Problematization as a methodology for generating research questions
6 Applying the problematization methodology
7 Why does gap-spotting dominate when it reduces the chance to create interesting theories?
8 Constructing interesting research questions: problematization and beyond
「Nielsen BookData」 より