廃校の利用状況の違いに影響を与える要因に関する研究

書誌事項

タイトル別名
  • A STUDY ON THE FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE USAGE SITUATION OF CLOSED SCHOOLS
  • 廃校の利用状況の違いに影響を与える要因に関する研究 : 愛知県・岐阜県・三重県・静岡県の事例を通して
  • ハイコウ ノ リヨウ ジョウキョウ ノ チガイ ニ エイキョウ オ アタエル ヨウイン ニ カンスル ケンキュウ : アイチケン ・ ギフケン ・ ミエケン ・ シズオカケン ノ ジレイ オ トオシテ
  • - In case of Aichi, Gifu, Mie, and Sizuoka prefecture -
  • -愛知県・岐阜県・三重県・静岡県の事例を通して-

この論文をさがす

抄録

<p> This study clarified the following contents.</p><p> </p><p> ・The closed schools, occurred in the Heisei period, was reused about 50% at the highest rate, unused at about 30%, and demolished about 20% at the lowest. In addition, the number of reused and unused of closed schools has been increasing since around 2003, and the merger of municipalities is assumed to be the main factor.</p><p> ・Regardless of the type of school, the ratio of reuse was the highest at about 40-50%, 30% of unused, and 20% of demolished. In addition, in both the elementary and junior high schools, the number of reused and unused of closed schools increased from around 2003, but there was no difference in demolition around the period.</p><p> ・It was found that the number of local governments that has a policy of using closed schools is low at around only 20%, which shows not much progress on the improvement rate. By the presence or absence of closed schools, the improvement rate of local governments with closed schools is five times higher than that of local governments without closed schools. It is considered that the experience of local government in utilizing closed schools contributes to the awareness for the necessity of reuse.</p><p> ・The relationship between the improvement situation of usage policy, and the actual usage situation of closed school has less to do with "reuse". The closed school is “unused”, when there is no specific guidance, then “demolished” when the policy toward the closed school is set to demolish.</p><p> ・The relationship between the occurrence of closed schools and the actual usage situation of closed schools has less to with "reuse" and "demolition". It is presumed that “unused” is likely to leave the school unused after the school is closed, because there is no upcoming schedule of closing schools which leads to the lack of usage plan.</p><p> ・The percentage of those who preferred to actively reuse closed schools was no less than 50%, but the relationship with the actual usage situation of closed schools was weak with “reuse”. It is considered that it becomes “unused” when the intention of positive use is not yet determined, and “demolished” when it is properly judged according to the usage policy.</p><p> ・From the discriminant analysis, the facility size of the building specifications affected the difference in the usage situation at the beginning of Heisei. However, since 2000, in addition to the building specifications such as the number of years after the construction and structural reliability, the decline of population and birthrate, and the slow-down of the city’s growth became a part of new factors. It was found out that these factors which relates to the population of the regional attribute influenced the difference in the usage situation, then the deterioration of the strength of the local governments also became a new factor subsequently.</p><p> ・From the categorical canonical correlation analysis, the facility size of the building specifications affected the difference in the usage situation before the year of 2000, when the population continued to increase. However, it was made to appear that the regional attributes such as the slow-down of the city’s growth and the deterioration of the strength of the local government in addition to the merger of municipalities became new factors.</p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (6)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ