A relational metaphysic
著者
書誌事項
A relational metaphysic
(Studies in philosophy and religion, v. 4)
Martinus Nijhoff, 1981
大学図書館所蔵 全6件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Bibliography: p. [209]-215
Includes indexes
内容説明・目次
内容説明
C. S. Peirce's indictment that "the chief cause of [metaphysics'] backward condition is that its leading professors have been theo (Collected Papers 6:3) falls heavily at my door. For it logians" was out of reflection upon religious experience and its meaning that the present relational metaphysic was conceived. My hope, however, is that its scope is sufficiently wider than its theological origins to justify its appearance as a work in philosophy. Having been nurtured in existential philosophy and having reached some measure of maturity with the wise counsel of Professor Dr. Fritz Buri, of Basel, I came to feel that theology as a modern discipline had reached an impasse owing to its overextended commitments to a subject-object paradigm of thought. Even those theologians who despaired of these ties seemed unable to find an independent alternative idiom for their ideas. A second tension in my thinking resulted from the inordinate neglect by theologians of the natural world. Also, my natural interest in physical understanding seemed unfulfilled within the narrow confines of theology, even of philosophical theology as then practiced. As I turned decisively toward the study of modern physics, and especially of cosmology, a new world seemed to open up to me. After extensive study with prominent astronomers and physicists, it began to dawn on me that the new physics has devised conceptual paradigms of thought which could be generalized into a metaphysical system of universal interest.
目次
One: A New Paradigm in Physics and Metaphysics.- to Part One.- I. The Subject-Object Paradigm and its Debt to Classical Physics.- A. Newton versus Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century.- 1. Newton's "Laws".- 2. Absolute Time and Space.- 3. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.- B. Kant's Critical Philosophy and Its Roots in Physics.- 1. Kant's Pre-critical Philosophy.- 2. Kant's Critical Philosophy.- C. The Newtonian Era in Science and Philosophy.- II. The Emergence of a Relational Paradigm in Modern Physics and Philosophy.- A. The Collapse of the Newtonian World and Its Paradigm.- B. The Emergence of a Relational Paradigm.- 1. In Modern Physics.- a. Special and General Relativity.- b. Quantum Theory.- 2. In Modern Metaphysics.- a. Alfred North Whitehead: His Physics and Metaphysics.- i. The Mathematical-Physical Foundations.- ii. Whitehead's Metaphysical Vision.- b. Systems Philosophy.- i. General Systems Theory: von Bertalanffy.- ii. A Systems Metaphysic: Laszlo.- (a) Fundamentals.- (b) Universe as Systems Matrix.- Conclusion to Part One.- Two: Foundations of a Relational Metaphysic.- to Part Two.- III. A Relational Axiom: The Doctrine of Universal Internality.- A. The Modern Debate on Internal versus External Relations.- 1. F.H. Bradley: "All Relations Are Internal".- 2. Bertrand Russell: "All Relations Are External".- 3. G.E. Moore: "Some Relations Are Internal, Some External".- 4. An Interlude: A.C. Ewing.- B. Contemporary Options.- 1. Charles Hartshorne: "A Logic of Ultimate Contrasts".- 2. Brand Blanshard: "The Coherent World".- C. A Relational Axiom: The Thesis of Universal Internality.- IV. A Step "Beyond": Relation is Fundamental.- A. Relational Ontology in statu nascendi.- 1. Ludwig Feuerbach.- 2. Martin Buber's Ontology of "das Zwischen".- 3. Syed A.R. Zaidi: "Towards a Relational Metaphysics".- B. A Relational Metaphysic.- 1. The Law of a Relational Metaphysic.- 2. Fundamental Tenets of a Relational Metaphysic.- a. The Relational Paradigm: Relations and Perspects.- i. Relations are fundamental.- ii. The terms of relations, i.e. the "relata," are derivatives of experience which, because they arise from bi-perspectival viewing, are called "Perspects".- b. The Hierarchy of Relations and Their Perspects.- i. Simple Relations and Their Bi-Perspects: A Paradigm for a Relational Ontology.- ii. Composites of Relations and Their Compound Perspects.- (a) Composites of Relations.- (b) Compound Perspects.- (1) The Subject Self.- (2) Object-Things.- (3) Object-Selves.- iii. The Totality of Relations and Their Omni-Perspects.- (a) The Totality of Relations.- (b) The Omni-Perspects: GOD and WORLD.- (1) The Ingressive Omni-Perspect: GOD.- (2) The Effective Omni-Perspect: WORLD.- V. Fundamentals and Pseudo-Fundamentals.- A. The Phenomenological Disclosure of Fundamentals.- B. The Genesis of Pseudo-Fundamentals (i.e Derivatives).- 1. The Rational Objectivation of Myth.- 2. The Visual Bias.- 3. Epistemological Bifurcation.- Conclusion to Part Two.- Notes.- Name Index.
「Nielsen BookData」 より