The Supreme Court review

Author(s)

• Kurland, Philip B.
• Casper, Gerhard
• Hutchinson, Dennis J.
• Strauss, David A.
• Stone, Geoffrey R.
• Driver, Justin

Bibliographic Information

The Supreme Court review

edited by Philip B. Kurland

University of Chicago Press, 1960-

• 1960
• 1961
• 1962
• 1963
• 1964
• 1965
• 1966
• 1967
• 1968
• 1969
• 1970
• 1971
• 1972
• 1973
• 1974
• 1975
• 1976
• 1977
• 1978
• 1979
• 1980
• 1981
• 1982
• 1983
• 1984
• 1985
• 1986
• 1987
• 1988
• 1989
• 1990
• 1991
• 1992
• 1993
• 1994
• 1995
• 1996
• 1997
• 1998
• 1999
• 2000
• 2001
• 2002
• 2003
• 2004
• 2005
• 2006
• 2007
• 2008
• 2009
• 2010
• 2011
• 2012
• 2013
• 2014
• 2015
• 2016
• 2017
• 2018

Note

At head of title: The Law School, The University of Chicago

Vol. 1977-: edited by Philip B. Kurland and Gerhard Casper -- v. 1981-: edited by Philip B. Kurland, Gerhard Casper and Dennis J. Hutchinson -- v. 1989: edited by Gerhard Casper and Dennis J. Hutchinson -- v. 1990: edited by Gerhard Casper, Dennis J. Hutchinson and David A. Strauss

Vol. 1991-: edited by Dennis J. Hutchinson, David A. Strauss and Geoffrey R. Stone -- [v.] 2018. edited by Geoffrey R. Stone, David A. Strauss and Justin Driver

Description and Table of Contents

Volume

2012 ISBN 9780226052014

Description

For fifty years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant decisions. The Review is an indepth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

Volume

2013 ISBN 9780226158730

Description

For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

Volume

2014 ISBN 9780226269061

Description

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Courts' most significant decisions. With an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. The recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

Volume

1992 ISBN 9780226362472

Description

Since it first appeared in 1960, the "Supreme Court Review" has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on "Prigg v. Pennsylvania"; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

Volume

1993 ISBN 9780226362489

Description

The 1993 review of decisions made by the Supreme Court of the United States includes articles by: Laurence H. Tribe on hate-crime and animal sacrifice; Cass R. Sunstein on standing injuries; Joseph L. Hoffman and William J. Stuntz on Habeas after the revolution; Rebecca L. Brown on political questions affecting individual rights; Daniel R. Fischel and Alan O. Sykes on civil RICO After Reves; Jack M. Beermann on the narrow view on civil rights; Pamela S. Karlan on the Court's voting rights trilogy; Kenneth W. Dam on the Hartford fire case; and Dean Alfange, Jr on Marbury vs Madison.

Volume

2000 ISBN 9780226362496

Description

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."-Ethics The Supreme Court Review keeps you at the forefront of the Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion. Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their contributions to each volume.

Volume

2001 ISBN 9780226362502

Description

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

Volume

2005 ISBN 9780226362519

Description

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous first and fourth amendment cases. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes and discuss the implications of court decisions.

Volume

2007 ISBN 9780226362526

Description

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

Volume

2008 ISBN 9780226362533

Description

For forty-eight years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

Volume

2009 ISBN 9780226362557

Description

For forty-nine years, the "Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. "The Review" is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

Volume

2011 ISBN 9780226362564

Description

For fifty years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. "The Review" is an indepth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, designed to be at the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

Volume

1994 ISBN 9780226363110

Description

Since it first appeared in 1960, this review has provided a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania ; Richard H. Fallon, Jr on sexual harassment, content neutrality and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

Volume

1996 ISBN 9780226363134

Description

This annual publication provides a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of a number of diverse essays, each volume presents analyses of opinions and discusses public law issues which have come under Court consideration.

Volume

1997 ISBN 9780226363141

Description

"The Supreme Court Review" provides a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions.

Table of Contents

Which Question? Which Lie? Reflections on the Physician-Assisted Suicide Cases Martha Minow The Value of Seeing Things Differently: Boerne v Flores and Congressional Enforcement of the Bill of Rights David Cole Congressional Power and Religious Liberty after City of Boerne v Flores Christopher L. Eisgruber, Lawrence G. Sager. Freedom of Speech, Shielding Children, and Transcending Balancing Eugene Volokh Printz, State Sovereignty, and the Limits of Formalism Evan H. Caminker O'Hagan's Problems Victor Brudney Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment David A. Sklansky Entrenching the Duopoly: Why the Supreme Court Should not Allow the States to Protect the Democrats and Republicans from Political Competition Richard L. Hasen "The Ideal New Frontier Judge" Dennis J. Hutchinson The Court and the Corporation: Jurisprudence, Localism, and Federalism Gregory A. Mark Do not Go Gently into that Good Right: the First Amendment in the High Court of Australia Gerald N. Rosenberg, John M. Williams.

Volume

1998 ISBN 9780226363165

Description

Providing a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions, this work consists of essays by lawyers, historians and social scientists. It analyzes past and present opinions and discusses public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

Table of Contents

Skeptical Scrutiny of Plenary Power: Judicial and Executive Branch Decision Making in Miller v. Albright Cornelia T.L. Pillard and T. Alexander Aleinikoff The New Etiquette of Federalism: New York, Printz, and Yeskey Matthew Adler and Seth Kreimer The McCleskey Puzzle: Remedying Prosecutorial Discrimination Against Black Victims in Capital Sentencing Evan Tsen Lee and Ashutosh Bhagwat State Taxation and the Dormant Commerce Clause: The Object-Measure Approach Jesse H. Choper and Tung Yin Light on a Darkling Plain: Intercircuit Conflicts in the Perspective of Time and Experience Arthur D. Hellman The Plessy Era Michael J Klarman

Volume

1999 ISBN 9780226363172

Description

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticisms of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."-Ethics Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

Volume

2002 ISBN 9780226363196

Description

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.

Volume

2003 ISBN 9780226363202

Description

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues and sentiments, as well as the implications of Court decisions.

Volume

2004 ISBN 9780226363233

Description

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussions of the Court's most significant decisions. Distinguished participants hereanalyze current and previous public issues and sentiments and discuss the implications of court decisions.

Volume

2006 ISBN 9780226363257

Description

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

Volume

2010 ISBN 9780226363264

Description

For forty-nine years, the "Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

Volume

2015 ISBN 9780226392219

Description

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

Volume

2016 ISBN 9780226490847

Description

For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.

Volume

2018 ISBN 9780226646220

Description

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. This year's volume features prominent scholars assessing major legal events, including: Mark Tushnet on President Trump's "Muslim Ban" Kate Andrias on Union Fees in the Public Sector Cass R. Sunstein on Chevron without Chevron Tracey Maclin on the Fourth Amendment and Unauthorized Drivers Frederick Schauer on Precedent Pamela Karlan on Gay Equality and Racial Equality Randall Kennedy on Palmer v. Thompson Lisa Marshall Manheim and Elizabeth G. Porter on Voter Suppression Melissa Murray on Masterpiece Cakeshop Vikram David Amar on Commandeering Laura K. Donohue on Carpenter, Precedent, and Originalism Evan Caminker on Carpenter and Stability

by "Nielsen BookData"

Details

• NCID: BA0103735X
• ISBN:
  • 0226464210
  • 0226464229
  • 0226464237
  • 0226464245
  • 0226464253
  • 0226464261
  • 0226464288
  • 0226464296
  • 0226464318
  • 0226464326
  • 0226464334
  • 0226464342
  • 0226464350
  • 0226464369
  • 0226464377
  • 0226464385
  • 0226464393
  • 0226464407
  • 0226464415
  • 0226095711
  • 0226095738
  • 0226095746
  • 0226362477
  • 0226362485
  • 0226363112
  • 0226363120
  • 0226363139
  • 0226363147
  • 0226363163
  • 0226363171
  • 0226362493
  • 0226362507
  • 0226363198
  • 0226363201
  • 0226363236
  • 0226362515
  • 0226363252
  • 9780226362526
  • 9780226362533
  • 9780226362557
  • 9780226363264
  • 9780226362564
  • 9780226052014
  • 9780226158730
  • 9780226269061
  • 9780226392219
  • 9780226490847
  • 9780226576855
  • 9780226646220
• LCCN: 60014353
• Country Code: us
• Title Language Code: eng
• Text Language Code: eng
• Place of Publication: Chicago
• Pages/Volumes: v.
• Size: 25 cm
• Classification:
  • NDC8 : 327.122
• Subject Headings:
  • NDLSH : 最高裁判所