Evaluation models : viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation

書誌事項

Evaluation models : viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation

[edited by] George F. Madaus, Michael S. [i.e. J.] Scriven, Daniel L. Stufflebeam

(Evaluation in education and human services series)

Kluwer-Nijhoff, c1983 , Distributors for North America, Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1983

大学図書館所蔵 件 / 25

この図書・雑誌をさがす

注記

Includes bibliographical references and index

内容説明・目次

内容説明

Attempting fonnally to evaluate something involves the evaluator coming to grips with a number of abstract concepts such as value, merit, worth, growth, criteria, standards, objectives, needs, nonns, client, audience, validity, reliability, objectivity, practical significance, accountability, improvement, process, pro duct, fonnative, summative, costs, impact, infonnation, credibility, and - of course - with the tenn evaluation itself. To communicate with colleagues and clients, evaluators need to clarify what they mean when they use such tenns to denote important concepts central to their work. Moreover, evaluators need to integrate these concepts and their meanings into a coherent framework that guides all aspects of their work. If evaluation is to lay claim to the mantle of a profession, then these conceptualizations of evaluation must lead to the conduct of defensible evaluations. The conceptualization of evaluation can never be a one-time activity nor can any conceptualization be static. Conceptualizations that guide evaluation work must keep pace with the growth of theory and practice in the field. Further, the design and conduct of any particular study involves a good deal of localized conceptualization."

「Nielsen BookData」 より

関連文献: 1件中  1-1を表示

詳細情報

ページトップへ