Truth and objectivity
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Truth and objectivity
(Philosophical theory)
Basil Blackwell, 1990
Available at 25 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Bibliography: p. [298]-309
Includes index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book traces an argument from an ontology to a theory of truth, and back again. The ontology is that of scientific realism; the theory of truth is an evaluative theory. In the course of the argument it is shown that the correspondence and redundancy theories of truth most commonly accepted by scientific realists are either incompatible with scientific realism or unsatisfactory as theories of truth. Scientific realists cannot believe in the sorts of entities required as truth bearers in most versions of the correspondence theory, or in the relationships between possible worlds to which true model and conditional propositions are supposed to correspond. Redundancy theories are unsatisfactory because they fail to explain the value of truth. The only kind of truth theory compatible with scientific realism which gives a satisfactory account of the value of truth is an evaluative theory - one which identifies truth with what it is right epistemically to believe. To develop such a theory, it is necessary to spell out the preferred system of epistemic preferences, or values, with reference to which truth is to be defined.
From the perspective of a scientific realist, the most fundamental of these are likely to be for the kinds of beliefs or belief systems which have contributed most to our survival as a species. When truth is defined with reference to such a system of values, it appears that most of our scientific inductive strategies can be justified as more or less effective strategies for coming to know the truth. The truth theory thus justifies the ontology.
Table of Contents
- Part 1 Ontology: the scientific point of view
- the ontology of science
- scientific realism and empiricism. Part 2 Truth: the programme of analysis
- the bearers of truth
- redundancy theories. Part 3 Epistemology: naturalistic truth and epistemic evaluation
- the problem of induction
- realism and epistemic naturalism.
by "Nielsen BookData"