Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar
（Studies in natural language and linguistic theory, v. 22）
Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1991
- : hb
Available at / 64 libraries
-
Kobe Shoin Women's University Library / Kobe Shoin Women's College Library
: hb1016201,
801.5/90-B12104698 -
No Libraries matched.
- Remove all filters.
Note
Includes bibliographies and indexes
Description and Table of Contents
Description
Derivation or Representation? Hubert Haider & Klaus Netter 1 The Issue Derivation and Representation - these keywords refer both to a conceptual as well as to an empirical issue. Transformational grammar was in its outset (Chomsky 1957, 1975) a derivational theory which characterized a well-formed sentence by its derivation, i.e. a set of syntactic representations defined by a set of rules that map one representation into another. The set of mapping rules, the transformations, eventually became more and more abstract and were trivialized into a single one, namely "move a" , a general movement-rule. The constraints on movement were singled out in systems of principles that ap ply to the resulting representations, i.e. the configurations containing a moved element and its extraction site, the trace. The introduction of trace-theory (d. Chomsky 1977, ch.3 17, ch. 4) in principle opened up the possibility of com pletely abandoning movement and generating the possible outputs of movement directly, i.e. as structures that contain gaps representing the extraction sites.
Table of Contents
NP-Movement, Crossover and Chain-Formation.- NP-Movement and Expletive Chains.- Chain Formation, Reanalysis, and the Economy of Levels.- On Reconstruction and Coordination.- An Argument for Movement.- Barriers and the Theory of Binding.- Levels and Empty Categories in a Principles and Parameters Approach to Parsing.- Notes on Contributors.- Index of Names.- Index of Subjects.
by "Nielsen BookData"
