The concept of academic freedom :
著者
書誌事項
The concept of academic freedom
University of Texas Press, 1975
- : [pbk]
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全4件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Sponsored by the American Council of Learned Societies and the University of Texas Graduate School
Bibliography: p. [265]-267
Includes index
内容説明・目次
- 巻冊次
-
ISBN 9780292710160
内容説明
Most professors and administrators are aware that academic freedom is in danger of being brushed aside by a public that has little understanding of what is at stake. They may be only marginally aware that the defense of academic freedom is endangered by certain confusions concerning the nature of academic freedom, the criteria for its violation, and the structure of an adequate justification for claims to it. These confusions were enshrined in some of the central documents on the subject, including the 1940 Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure, agreed upon by the American Association of University Professors and the Association of American Colleges and endorsed by many professional organizations. Careful analysis of them will not do away with debate; it will bring the debate into focus, so that attacks on academic freedom can be appraised as near or far away from the center of the target and can then be appropriately answered. Nearly all the contemporary writing on academic freedom consists of attack or defense. The Concept of Academic Freedom is the first book to deal exclusively with fundamental conceptual issues underlying the battle. In the discussion of these issues, certain philosophical positions crystallize: radical versus liberal conceptions of the status and function of university teachers, specific versus general theories of academic freedom, consequential versus nonconsequential theories of justification. Partisans (and enemies) of academic freedom would do well to decide on which side of these divisions they stand, or how they would mediate between sides. Otherwise many questions will remain unclear: What is under discussion-a special right peculiar to academics or a general right that is especially important to academics? Is justification of that right possible? Can the right be derived from other rights, or from the theory of justice or of democratic society? Or is the argument for academic freedom one that more properly turns on the consequences for society as a whole if that freedom is not protected? The essays in this book explore these and other problems concerning the defense of academic freedom by radicals, the justification for disruption on campus, and the control of research. Contributors to the volume include Hugo Adam Bedau, Bertram H. Davis, Milton Fisk, Graham Hughes, Alan Pasch, Hardy E. Jones, Alexander Ritchie, Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, Rolf Sartorius, T. M. Scanlon, Richard Schmitt, John R. Searle, Judith Jarvis Thomson, and William Van Alstyne. All are outstanding in their fields. Many have had practical experience in the legal profession or with the American Association of University Professors on the issue of academic freedom.
- 巻冊次
-
: [pbk] ISBN 9780292766365
内容説明
Most professors and administrators are aware that academic freedom is in danger of being brushed aside by a public that has little understanding of what is at stake. They may be only marginally aware that the defense of academic freedom is endangered by certain confusions concerning the nature of academic freedom, the criteria for its violation, and the structure of an adequate justification for claims to it. These confusions were enshrined in some of the central documents on the subject, including the 1940 Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure, agreed upon by the American Association of University Professors and the Association of American Colleges and endorsed by many professional organizations. Careful analysis of them will not do away with debate; it will bring the debate into focus, so that attacks on academic freedom can be appraised as near or far away from the center of the target and can then be appropriately answered.
Nearly all the contemporary writing on academic freedom consists of attack or defense. The Concept of Academic Freedom is the first book to deal exclusively with fundamental conceptual issues underlying the battle. In the discussion of these issues, certain philosophical positions crystallize: radical versus liberal conceptions of the status and function of university teachers, specific versus general theories of academic freedom, consequential versus nonconsequential theories of justification. Partisans (and enemies) of academic freedom would do well to decide on which side of these divisions they stand, or how they would mediate between sides. Otherwise many questions will remain unclear: What is under discussion-a special right peculiar to academics or a general right that is especially important to academics? Is justification of that right possible? Can the right be derived from other rights, or from the theory of justice or of democratic society? Or is the argument for academic freedom one that more properly turns on the consequences for society as a whole if that freedom is not protected?
The essays in this book explore these and other problems concerning the defense of academic freedom by radicals, the justification for disruption on campus, and the control of research.
Contributors to the volume include Hugo Adam Bedau, Bertram H. Davis, Milton Fisk, Graham Hughes, Alan Pasch, Hardy E. Jones, Alexander Ritchie, Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, Rolf Sartorius, T. M. Scanlon, Richard Schmitt, John R. Searle, Judith Jarvis Thomson, and William Van Alstyne. All are outstanding in their fields. Many have had practical experience in the legal profession or with the American Association of University Professors on the issue of academic freedom.
目次
Introduction (Edmund L. Pincoffs)
Part One
1. Academic Freedom in Class Society (Milton Fisk)
2. Academic Freedom, Academic Neutrality, and the Social System (Bertram H. Davis)
3. Academic Freedom as a Moral Right (Hardy E. Jones)
4. Comments on Hardy Jones and Bertram Davis (Milton Fisk)
Part Two
5. The Specific Theory of Academic Freedom and the General Issue of Civil Liberty (William Van Alstyne)
6. Two Concepts of Academic Freedom (John R. Searle)
7. Dilemmas of Academic and Intellectual Freedom (Amelie Oksenberg Rorty)
8. Academic Freedom: The Future of a Confusion (Richard Schmitt)
9. Reply to Comments (William Van Alstyne)
Part Three
10. Tenure and Academic Freedom (Rolf Sartorius)
11. Tenure and Academic Freedom (Alexander Ritchie)
12. Tenure and Academic Freedom (Graham Hughes)
13. Some Comments on Sartorius's Paper on Tenure (Amelie Oksenberg Rorty)
14. Tenure, Academic Freedom, and the Nature of the University (Rolf Sartorius)
Part Four
15. Free Speech, the Right to Listen, and Disruptive Interference (Hugo Adam Bedau)
16. Comments on Bedau's "Free Speech, the Right to Listen, and Disruptive Interference" (Alan Pasch)
17. Reply to Alan Pasch (Hugo Adam Bedau)
18. Comments on Bedau's Reply (Alan Pasch)
Part Five
19. Academic Freedom and the Control of Research (T. M. Scanlon)
20. Academic Freedom and Research (Judith Jarvis Thomson)
Appendix: A Proposed Statement on Academic Freedom (Judith Jarvis Thomson)
Bibliography: Some Suggestions for Further Reading
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より