Armies and warfare in the Middle Ages : the English experience
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Armies and warfare in the Middle Ages : the English experience
Yale University Press, 1996
- : hbk
Available at 11 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references (p. [375]-386) and index
Description and Table of Contents
Description
While medieval military life is sometimes pictured in terms of knights in armour with splendid coats of arms, the reality more often consisted of men struggling against cold and damp and against elusive foes who refused to do battle. In this book, Michael Prestwich re-creates the experience of medieval warfare, examining how English medieval armies fought, how men of all ranks of society were recruited, how the troops were fed, supplied and deployed, what new weapons were developed, and what structure was set in place for military command. Michael Prestwich challenges many common assumptions about medieval warfare. He argues that medieval commanders were capable of much more sophisticated strategies than is usually assumed: spies were an important part of the machinery of war, and the destruction of crops and the burning of villages were part of a deliberate plan to force a foe to negotiate, rather than an indication of lack of discipline. Sieges, often lengthy and expensive, were more prevalent in war than were battles. In battle, the mounted knight was never as dominant as is often thought: even in the 12th century, many battles were won by unmounted men.
Medieval warfare was not, on the whole, any more chivalric than warfare of other periods, although there were many notable individual deeds, particularly during the Hundred Years War, that brought great chivalric renown to those who performed them.
by "Nielsen BookData"