Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis : flight test applications
著者
書誌事項
Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis : flight test applications
(Advances in industrial control)
Springer, c1999
大学図書館所蔵 全11件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. [197]-204) and index
内容説明・目次
内容説明
This book introduces a new method of analyzing aeroelasticity for flexible aircraft by applying robust stability theory. This method was developed to address several concerns with traditional methods and improve the efficiency of flight flutter testing. One advantage to this method is the ability to consider modeling errors in the analysis and generate a worst-case flutter margin. Another advantage is the ability to incorporate flight data directly into the analysis to ensure the model accounts for poorly modeled properties that are observed on the aircraft. The material covered provides a detailed explanation of the method to analyze robust stability margins using Amu-analysis. It shows how to formulate aeroelastic models in the Amu framework using standard state-space concepts. It also presents several ways to represent modeling errors in this framework and discusses how these errors relate to typical errors in aeroelastic models. Algorithms are listed that demonstrate how to apply these robustness concepts to general aircraft models and compute worst-case stability margins.
Engineers working with flight test programs will be particularly interested in the material detailing methods of using flight data to update theoretical models and associated uncertainty descriptions. These methods represent a dramatic improvement over traditional analysis that separately analyze flight data and theoretical models. Incorporating the flight data presents the distinct benefit of ensuring the uncertainty description is a realistic representation of modeling errors so the worst-case stability margins are neither overly optimistic or conservative.
目次
- Introduction
- Robust Stability Theory
- Structured Singular Value mu
- Dynamics of Flexible Flight Vehicles
- Formulating Aeroservoelastic Dynamics in the mu Framework
- Uncertainty Descriptions in Aeroservoelastic Models
- Model Validation of Uncertainty
- Robust Stability Margins
- Procedure for mu Method
- A Flutterometer Flight Test Tool
- Application: Robust Flutter Margins of a 2-DOF System
- Application: Robust Flutter Margins
- Application: Robust Flutter Margins of an F/A-18
- Application: Robust Aeroservoelastic Margins of a Thrust-Vectoring F/A-18
- Application: Sensitivity Analysis for a Commercial Transport Aircraft
- Application: Flight Test Predictions of Instability using a Flutterometer.
「Nielsen BookData」 より