Assessing research-doctorate programs : a methodology study
著者
書誌事項
Assessing research-doctorate programs : a methodology study
National Academies Press, c2003
大学図書館所蔵 全3件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 65-66)
内容説明・目次
内容説明
How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph.D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings.
Table of Contents
Front Matter
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
2. How the Study Was Conducted
3. Taxonomy
4. Quantitative Measures
5. Student Education and Outcomes
6. Reputation and Data Presentation
7. General Conclusions and Recommendations
8. References
Appendix A: Biographical Sketches: Committee and Panels
Appendix B: Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations
Appendix C: Meetings and Participants
Appendix D: Sample Questionnaires
Appendix E: Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields
Appendix F: Fields for Ph.D.s Granted During 1996-2001
Appendix G: Technical and Statistical Techniques
目次
- 1 Front Matter
- 2 Executive Summary
- 3 1. Introduction
- 4 2. How the Study Was Conducted
- 5 3. Taxonomy
- 6 4. Quantitative Measures
- 7 5. Student Education and Outcomes
- 8 6. Reputation and Data Presentation
- 9 7. General Conclusions and Recommendations
- 10 8. References
- 11 Appendix A: Biographical Sketches: Committee and Panels
- 12 Appendix B: Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations
- 13 Appendix C: Meetings and Participants
- 14 Appendix D: Sample Questionnaires
- 15 Appendix E: Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields
- 16 Appendix F: Fields for Ph.D.s Granted During 1996-2001
- 17 Appendix G: Technical and Statistical Techniques
「Nielsen BookData」 より