Quality of software architectures and software quality : First International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA 2005, and Second International Workshop on Software Quality, SOQUA 2005, Erfurt, Germany, September 20-22, 2005 : proceedings
著者
書誌事項
Quality of software architectures and software quality : First International Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA 2005, and Second International Workshop on Software Quality, SOQUA 2005, Erfurt, Germany, September 20-22, 2005 : proceedings
(Lecture notes in computer science, 3712)
Springer, c2005
大学図書館所蔵 全7件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
Other editors: Johannes Mayer, Judith A. Stafford, Sven Overhage, Steffen Becker, Patrick J. Schroeder
内容説明・目次
内容説明
The goal of software engineering is to achieve high-quality software in a cost-effective, timely, and reproducible manner. Advances in technology offer reductions in cost and schedule, but their effect on software quality often remains unknown. The International Conferenceon the Quality of Software Architectures(QoSA 2005)focusedon software architectures and their relation to software quality, while the International Workshop on Software Quality (SOQUA 2005) mainly focused on quality assurance and more precisely on software testing. These events complement each other in their view on software quality. One of the main motivations for explicitly modelling software architectures is to enable reasoning on software quality. From a software engineering perspective, a so- ware architecture not only depicts the coarse-grained structure of a program, but also includes additional information such as the program's dynamics (i. e. , the ?ows of c- trol through the system) and the mapping of its components and connections to e- cution environments (such as hardware processors, virtual machines, network conn- tions, and the like).
In this area, QoSA 2005is concernedwith researchand experiences that investigate the in?uence a speci?c software architecturehas on software quality - pects. Additionally,the developmentof methodsto evaluate software architectureswith respect to these quality attributes is considered to be an important topic. The quality - tributes of interest include external properties, such as reliability and ef?ciency, as well as internal properties, such as maintainability.
目次
Keynotes.- Reexamining the Role of Interactions in Software Architecture.- Are Successful Test Cases Useless or Not?.- QoSA Long Papers.- DoSAM - Domain-Specific Software Architecture Comparison Model.- An Architecture-Centric Approach for Producing Quality Systems.- A Model-Oriented Framework for Runtime Monitoring of Nonfunctional Properties.- Predicting Mean Service Execution Times of Software Components Based on Markov Models.- An XML-Based Language to Support Performance and Reliability Modeling and Analysis in Software Architectures.- Formal Definition of Metrics Upon the CORBA Component Model.- The Architect's Dilemma - Will Reference Architectures Help?.- Architectural Reuse in Software Systems In-house Integration and Merge - Experiences from Industry.- Supporting Security Sensitive Architecture Design.- Exploring Quality Attributes Using Architectural Prototyping.- On the Estimation of Software Reliability of Component-Based Dependable Distributed Systems.- Empirical Evaluation of Model-Based Performance Prediction Methods in Software Development.- SOQUA Long Papers.- Automatic Test Generation for N-Way Combinatorial Testing.- Automated Generation and Evaluation of Dataflow-Based Test Data for Object-Oriented Software.- Automated Model-Based Testing of ? Simulation Models with TorX.- Jartege: A Tool for Random Generation of Unit Tests for Java Classes.- FlexTest: An Aspect-Oriented Framework for Unit Testing.- Quality Assurance in Performance: Evaluating Mono Benchmark Results.
「Nielsen BookData」 より