Fault-tolerance techniques for SRAM-based FPGAs
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Fault-tolerance techniques for SRAM-based FPGAs
(Frontiers in electronic testing, 32)
Springer, c2006
- : hb
Available at 5 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Includes bibliographical references
Description and Table of Contents
Description
This book reviews fault-tolerance techniques for SRAM-based Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), outlining many methods for designing fault tolerance systems. Some of these are based on new fault-tolerant architecture, and others on protecting the high-level hardware description before synthesis in the FPGA. The text helps the reader choose the best techniques project-by-project, and to compare fault tolerant techniques for programmable logic applications.
Table of Contents
DEDICATION. CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS. PREFACE. 1. INTRODUCTION. 2. RADIATION EFFECTS IN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS. 2.1 RADIATION ENVIROMENT OVERVIEW. 2.2 RADIATION EFFECTS IN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS. 2.2.1 SEU Classification. 2.3 PECULIAR EFFECTS IN SRAM-BASED FPGAS. 3. SINGLE EVENT UPSET (SEU) MITIGATION TECHNIQUES. 3.1 DESIGN-BASED TECHNIQUES. 3.1.1 Detection Techniques. 3.1.2 Mitigation Techniques. 3.1.2.1 Full Time and Hardware Redundancy. 3.1.2.2 Error Correction and Detection Codes. 3.1.2.3 Hardened Memory Cells. 3.2 EXAMPLES OF SEU MITIGATION TECHNIQUES IN ASICS. 3.3 EXAMPLES OF SEU MITIGATION TECHNIQUES IN FPGAS. 3.3.1 Antifuse based FPGAs. 3.3.2 SRAM-based FPGAs. 3.3.2.1 SEU Mitigation Solution in high-level description. 3.3.2.2 SEU Mitigation Solutions at the Architectural level. 3.3.2.3 Recovery technique. 4. ARCHITECTURAL SEU MITIGATION TECHNIQUES. 5. HIGH-LEVEL SEU MITIGATION TECHNIQUES. 5.1 TRIPLE MODULAR REDUNDANCY TECHNIQUE FOR FPGAS. 5.2 SCRUBBING. 6. TRIPLE MODULAR REDUNDANCY (TMR) ROBUSTNESS. 6.1 TEST DESIGN METHODOLOGY. 6.2 FAULT INJECTION IN THE FPGA BITSTREAM. 6.3 LOCATING THE UPSET IN THE DESIGN FLOORPLANNING. 6.3.1 Bit column location in the matrix. 6.3.2 Bit row location in the matrix. 6.3.3 Bit location in the CLB. 6.3.4 Bit Classification. 6.4 FAULT INJECTION RESULTS. 6.5 THE 'GOLDEN' CHIP APPROACH. 7. DESIGNING AND TESTING A TMR MICRO-CONTROLLER. 7.1 AREA AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS. 7.2 TMR 8051 MICRO-CONTROLLER RADIATION GROUND TEST RESULTS. 8. REDUCING TMR OVERHEADS: PART I. 8.1 DUPLICATION WITH COMPARISON COMBINED WITH TIME REDUNDANCY. 8.2 FAULT INJECTION IN THE VHDL DESCRIPTION. 8.3 AREA AND PERFORMANCE RESULTS. 9. REDUCING TMR OVERHEADS: PART II. 9.1 DWC-CED TECHNIQUE IN ARITHMETIC-BASED CIRCUITS. 9.1.1 Using CEDbased on hardware redundancy. 9.1.2 Using CED based on time redundancy. 9.1.3 Choosing the most appropriated CED block. 9.1.3.1 Multipliers. 9.1.3.2 Arithmetic and Logic Unit (ALU). 9.1.3.3 Digital FIR Filter. 9.1.4 Fault Coverage Results. 9.1.4 Area and Performance Results. 9.2 DESIGNING DWC-CED TECHNIQUE IN NON-ARITHMETIC-BASED CIRCUITS. 10. FINAL REMARKS. REFERENCES.
by "Nielsen BookData"