Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto
Author(s)
Bibliographic Information
Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto
Ko I Sam (Shinkansha), 2008
- Other Title
-
Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto : a critique of the "10 issues of Takeshima" published by the MOFA of Japan
Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto : a critique of the 10 issues of Takeshima published by the MOFA of Japan
竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省『竹島』批判
竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省竹島批判
Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokdo
Available at 79 libraries
  Aomori
  Iwate
  Miyagi
  Akita
  Yamagata
  Fukushima
  Ibaraki
  Tochigi
  Gunma
  Saitama
  Chiba
  Tokyo
  Kanagawa
  Niigata
  Toyama
  Ishikawa
  Fukui
  Yamanashi
  Nagano
  Gifu
  Shizuoka
  Aichi
  Mie
  Shiga
  Kyoto
  Osaka
  Hyogo
  Nara
  Wakayama
  Tottori
  Shimane
  Okayama
  Hiroshima
  Yamaguchi
  Tokushima
  Kagawa
  Ehime
  Kochi
  Fukuoka
  Saga
  Nagasaki
  Kumamoto
  Oita
  Miyazaki
  Kagoshima
  Okinawa
  Korea
  China
  Thailand
  United Kingdom
  Germany
  Switzerland
  France
  Belgium
  Netherlands
  Sweden
  Norway
  United States of America
Note
Other title information of 第2刷, 2012: Case of Takeshima/Dokdo
Translation of: 竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省『竹島』批判
奥付に「2009年1月30日第1刷発行」と押印されたものあり
Description and Table of Contents
Table of Contents
- 1 Japan has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→Is it true?
- 2 There is no evidence that the Republic of Korea(ROK)has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→What is the truth?
- 3 Japan used Takeshima as a stopover port en route to Utsuryo(Ulleung‐do)Island and as fishing ground.It thus established its sovereignty over Takeshima by the mid 17th century at the very latest.→What are the grounds for this argument?
- 4 At the end of the 17th century Japan prohibited passage of ships to Utsuryo Island,but not to Takeshima.→What are the historic facts?
- 5 The deposition by Ahn Yong‐bok,on which the ROK side bases its claim,contains many points that conflict with factual evidence.→What is the important fact?
- 6 Japan reaffirmed its intention to claim sovereignty over Takeshima by incorporating Takeshima into Shimane Prefecture in 1905.→What does “reaffirmed its intention” mean?
- 7 In the drafting process of the Treaty of Peace with Japan,the United States rejected the request by the ROK that Takeshima be added to the relevant article of the Treaty as one of the areas which Japan would renounce,asserting that Takeshima had been under the jurisdiction of Japan.→What was the position of the Allied Powers and the United States?
- 8 In 1952,Takeshima was designated as a bombing range for the U.S.Forces stationed in Japan,which shows that Takeshima was treated as part of the territory of Japan.→What was the background of this U.S.action?
- 9 The ROK is illegally occupying Takeshima,against which Japan has been consistently making strong protests.→What are Japan’s protests about?
- 10 Although Japan proposed to the ROK that the dispute over Takeshima be referred to the International Court of Justice,the ROK rejected this proposal.→What are the untold stories?
by "BOOK database"