Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto

Bibliographic Information

Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto

text by Seichu Naito ; translated by Sinkansya Editorial Room

Ko I Sam (Shinkansha), 2008

Other Title

Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto : a critique of the "10 issues of Takeshima" published by the MOFA of Japan

Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokto : a critique of the 10 issues of Takeshima published by the MOFA of Japan

竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省『竹島』批判

竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省竹島批判

Territorial issue between Japan and Korea : case of Takeshima/Dokdo

Available at  / 79 libraries

Search this Book/Journal

Note

Other title information of 第2刷, 2012: Case of Takeshima/Dokdo

Translation of: 竹島=独島問題入門 : 日本外務省『竹島』批判

奥付に「2009年1月30日第1刷発行」と押印されたものあり

Description and Table of Contents

Table of Contents

  • 1 Japan has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→Is it true?
  • 2 There is no evidence that the Republic of Korea(ROK)has long recognized the existence of Takeshima.→What is the truth?
  • 3 Japan used Takeshima as a stopover port en route to Utsuryo(Ulleung‐do)Island and as fishing ground.It thus established its sovereignty over Takeshima by the mid 17th century at the very latest.→What are the grounds for this argument?
  • 4 At the end of the 17th century Japan prohibited passage of ships to Utsuryo Island,but not to Takeshima.→What are the historic facts?
  • 5 The deposition by Ahn Yong‐bok,on which the ROK side bases its claim,contains many points that conflict with factual evidence.→What is the important fact?
  • 6 Japan reaffirmed its intention to claim sovereignty over Takeshima by incorporating Takeshima into Shimane Prefecture in 1905.→What does “reaffirmed its intention” mean?
  • 7 In the drafting process of the Treaty of Peace with Japan,the United States rejected the request by the ROK that Takeshima be added to the relevant article of the Treaty as one of the areas which Japan would renounce,asserting that Takeshima had been under the jurisdiction of Japan.→What was the position of the Allied Powers and the United States?
  • 8 In 1952,Takeshima was designated as a bombing range for the U.S.Forces stationed in Japan,which shows that Takeshima was treated as part of the territory of Japan.→What was the background of this U.S.action?
  • 9 The ROK is illegally occupying Takeshima,against which Japan has been consistently making strong protests.→What are Japan’s protests about?
  • 10 Although Japan proposed to the ROK that the dispute over Takeshima be referred to the International Court of Justice,the ROK rejected this proposal.→What are the untold stories?

by "BOOK database"

Details

Page Top