Reputation for resolve : how leaders signal determination in international politics
著者
書誌事項
Reputation for resolve : how leaders signal determination in international politics
(Cornell studies in security affairs / edited by Robert J. Art, Robert Jervis, and Stephen M. Walt)
Cornell University Press, 2020
- : cloth
大学図書館所蔵 全5件
  青森
  岩手
  宮城
  秋田
  山形
  福島
  茨城
  栃木
  群馬
  埼玉
  千葉
  東京
  神奈川
  新潟
  富山
  石川
  福井
  山梨
  長野
  岐阜
  静岡
  愛知
  三重
  滋賀
  京都
  大阪
  兵庫
  奈良
  和歌山
  鳥取
  島根
  岡山
  広島
  山口
  徳島
  香川
  愛媛
  高知
  福岡
  佐賀
  長崎
  熊本
  大分
  宮崎
  鹿児島
  沖縄
  韓国
  中国
  タイ
  イギリス
  ドイツ
  スイス
  フランス
  ベルギー
  オランダ
  スウェーデン
  ノルウェー
  アメリカ
注記
Includes bibliographical references (p. 231-243) and index
収録内容
- Introduction : why leaders and their reputations for resolve matter
- How leaders establish reputations for resolve
- How leader-specific reputations form and change across repeated interactions
- How contextual factors influence leader-specific reputations
- A reputation for resolute action : Eisenhower and Berlin
- A reputation for irresolute action : Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba
- Conclusions : lessons in leader-specific reputations for resolve
内容説明・目次
内容説明
How do reputations form in international politics? What influence do these reputations have on the conduct of international affairs? In Reputation for Resolve, Danielle L. Lupton takes a new approach to answering these enduring and hotly debated questions by shifting the focus away from the reputations of countries and instead examining the reputations of individual leaders.
Lupton argues that new leaders establish personal reputations for resolve that are separate from the reputations of their predecessors and from the reputations of their states. Using innovative survey experiments and in-depth archival research, she finds that leaders acquire personal reputations for resolve based on their foreign policy statements and behavior. Reputation for Resolve shows that statements create expectations of how leaders will react to foreign policy crises in the future and that leaders who fail to meet expectations of resolute action face harsh reputational consequences.
Reputation for Resolve challenges the view that reputations do not matter in international politics. In sharp contrast, Lupton shows that the reputations for resolve of individual leaders influence the strategies statesmen pursue during diplomatic interactions and crises, and she delineates specific steps policymakers can take to avoid developing reputations for irresolute action. Lupton demonstrates that reputations for resolve do exist and can influence the conduct of international security. Thus, Reputation for Resolve reframes our understanding of the influence of leaders and their rhetoric on crisis bargaining and the role reputations play in international politics.
目次
Introduction: Why Leaders and Their Reputations for Resolve Matter
1. How Leaders Establish Reputations for Resolve
2. How Leader-Specific Reputations Form and Change across Repeated Interactions
3. How Contextual Factors Influence Leader-Specific Reputations
4. A Reputation for Resolute Action: Eisenhower and Berlin
5. A Reputation for Irresolute Action: Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba
Conclusion: Lessons in Leader-Specific Reputations for Resolve
「Nielsen BookData」 より