Ideology in the language of judges : how judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control
著者
書誌事項
Ideology in the language of judges : how judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control
（Oxford studies in anthropological linguistics, 17）
Oxford University Press, 1998
- : [hbk]
- : pbk
大学図書館所蔵 件 / 全28件
-
該当する所蔵館はありません
- すべての絞り込み条件を解除する
注記
Includes bibliographical references and index
内容説明・目次
- 巻冊次
-
: [hbk] ISBN 9780195113402
内容説明
Philips looks at the languages of judges in the courtroom to show that, while judges see themselves as impartial agents of the constitutional right to due process, there is actually much diversity in the way that judges interract with defendants due to their interpretations of the law, their attitudes toward courtroom control, and their own political-ideological stances regarding due process. She uses courtroom transcripts, interviews, and the written law itself to
show how ideological diversity is organized in legal discourse.
目次
Introduction
1: Ideology in Discourse
2: The Myth of the Trial Court Judge as Nonideological
3: Intertextual Relations between Written and Spoken Genres of Law
4: Two Ideological Stances in Taking Guilty Pleas
5: Judges' Ideologies of Courtroom Control
6: Ideological Diversity in Legal Discourses
Appendixes
Appendix A: Social Background Questionnaire
Appendix B: Career History Interview
Appendix C: Rule 17, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure: Pleas of Guilty and No Contest
Appendix D: Plea Agreement
Appendix E: Transcription Notations
Appendix F: Four Changes of Plea / Guilty Plea Transcripts
Appendix G: Refusal of Plea Agreement in Aborted Sentencing Transcript
Notes
References
Index
- 巻冊次
-
: pbk ISBN 9780195113419
内容説明
Philips looks at the languages of judges in the courtroom to show that, while judges see themselves as impartial agents of the constitutional right to due process, there is actually much diversity in the way that judges interract with defendants due to their interpretations of the law, their attitudes toward courtroom control, and their own political-ideological stances regarding due process. She uses courtroom transcripts, interviews, and the written law itself to
show how ideological diversity is organized in legal discourse.
目次
Introduction
1: Ideology in Discourse
2: The Myth of the Trial Court Judge as Nonideological
3: Intertextual Relations between Written and Spoken Genres of Law
4: Two Ideological Stances in Taking Guilty Pleas
5: Judges' Ideologies of Courtroom Control
6: Ideological Diversity in Legal Discourse
Appendixes
Appendix A: Social Background Questionnaire
Appendix B: Career History Interview
Appendix C: Rule 17, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure: Pleas of Guilty and No Contest
Appendix D: Plea Agreement
Appendix E: Transcription Notations
Appendix F: Four Changes of Plea / Guilty Plea Transcripts
Appendix G: Refusal of Plea Agreement in Aborted Sentencing Transcript
Notes
References
Index
「Nielsen BookData」 より
